sgpemv2/src/backend/cpu_policies_gatekeeper.cc
tchernobog 9ff7502bb4 - This was an *evil* "chicken-or-egg-first" bug in CPUPoliciesGatekeeper. Now
CPUPolicy->activate() should run properly.


git-svn-id: svn://svn.gna.org/svn/sgpemv2/trunk@846 3ecf2c5c-341e-0410-92b4-d18e462d057c
2006-08-12 17:04:21 +00:00

166 lines
4.5 KiB
C++

// src/backend/cpu_policies_gatekeeper.cc - Copyright 2005, 2006, University
// of Padova, dept. of Pure and Applied
// Mathematics
//
// This file is part of SGPEMv2.
//
// This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
//
// SGPEMv2 is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
// GNU General Public License for more details.
//
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
// along with SGPEMv2; if not, write to the Free Software
// Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
#include "config.h"
#include "cpu_policies_gatekeeper.hh"
#include "cpu_policy_manager.hh"
#include "cpu_policy.hh"
// Include full template definition only in implementation files:
#include "singleton.tcc"
#include <algorithm>
#include <cassert>
using std::vector;
using std::map;
using std::find;
using std::runtime_error;
using namespace sgpem;
// Explicit template instantiation to allow to export symbols from the DSO.
template class SG_DLLEXPORT Singleton<CPUPoliciesGatekeeper>;
typedef vector<CPUPolicyManager*>::iterator ManagerIterator;
typedef map<History*, CPUPolicy*>::iterator ActiveIterator;
vector<CPUPolicyManager*>
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::get_registered() const
{
return _registered;
}
void
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::register_manager(CPUPolicyManager* manager)
{
assert(manager != NULL);
ManagerIterator end = _registered.end();
if (find(_registered.begin(), end, manager) == end)
_registered.push_back(manager);
}
void
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::unregister_manager(CPUPolicyManager* manager)
{
assert(manager != NULL);
ManagerIterator end = _registered.end();
ManagerIterator pos = find(_registered.begin(), end, manager);
if (pos != end)
{
deactivate_policies(*pos);
_registered.erase(pos);
}
}
CPUPolicy*
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::get_current_policy(History* history) throw(runtime_error)
{
assert(history != NULL);
ActiveIterator policy = _active_policies.find(history);
if (policy == _active_policies.end())
throw runtime_error("No active policy associated with this "
"history is available.");
return policy->second;
}
void
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::activate_policy(History *history, CPUPolicy* policy)
{
assert(history != NULL);
ActiveIterator end = _active_policies.end();
ActiveIterator pos = _active_policies.find(history);
if (pos != end && pos->second != policy)
_active_policies[history]->deactivate();
if(policy == NULL)
{
_active_policies.erase(pos);
return;
}
if (pos == end || pos->second != policy)
{
try
{
// policy->activate() needs already an active policy, because:
// * it calls the configure() method on the
// insert-your-favourite-scripting-language-here-policy
// * which in turn calls the configure() method in the
// code written by the user
// * which probably uses Simulation to get the _active_ C++ policy,
// so it can get its policy_parameters()
// ... so **DON'T** play Mr. Clever Dick and swap the following two
// lines in an optimization frenzy! Or the user policy WILL fail.
_active_policies[history] = policy;
policy->activate();
}
catch(const CPUPolicyException& e)
{
// See the comment above to understand why we do this
// in this way
_active_policies.erase(_active_policies.find(history));
}
}
}
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::CPUPoliciesGatekeeper()
{}
void
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::deactivate_policies(CPUPolicyManager* manager)
{
typedef vector<CPUPolicy*>::iterator CPUPolicyIterator;
vector<CPUPolicy*> avail_policies = manager->get_avail_policies();
CPUPolicyIterator avail_it = avail_policies.begin();
CPUPolicyIterator avail_end = avail_policies.end();
for (; avail_it != avail_end; ++avail_it)
{
// TODO isn't there a way to write more compact code by using
// library utilities?
ActiveIterator act_it = _active_policies.begin();
while (act_it != _active_policies.end())
{
if (act_it->second == *avail_it)
{
ActiveIterator removable = act_it++;
removable->second->deactivate();
_active_policies.erase(removable);
}
else
act_it++;
}
} //~ for(avail_it)
}