CPUPolicy->activate() should run properly. git-svn-id: svn://svn.gna.org/svn/sgpemv2/trunk@846 3ecf2c5c-341e-0410-92b4-d18e462d057c
166 lines
4.5 KiB
C++
166 lines
4.5 KiB
C++
// src/backend/cpu_policies_gatekeeper.cc - Copyright 2005, 2006, University
|
|
// of Padova, dept. of Pure and Applied
|
|
// Mathematics
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is part of SGPEMv2.
|
|
//
|
|
// This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
// the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
|
|
// (at your option) any later version.
|
|
//
|
|
// SGPEMv2 is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
// GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
//
|
|
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
// along with SGPEMv2; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|
// Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
|
|
|
|
#include "config.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "cpu_policies_gatekeeper.hh"
|
|
#include "cpu_policy_manager.hh"
|
|
#include "cpu_policy.hh"
|
|
|
|
// Include full template definition only in implementation files:
|
|
#include "singleton.tcc"
|
|
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
using std::vector;
|
|
using std::map;
|
|
using std::find;
|
|
using std::runtime_error;
|
|
using namespace sgpem;
|
|
|
|
// Explicit template instantiation to allow to export symbols from the DSO.
|
|
template class SG_DLLEXPORT Singleton<CPUPoliciesGatekeeper>;
|
|
|
|
typedef vector<CPUPolicyManager*>::iterator ManagerIterator;
|
|
typedef map<History*, CPUPolicy*>::iterator ActiveIterator;
|
|
|
|
vector<CPUPolicyManager*>
|
|
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::get_registered() const
|
|
{
|
|
return _registered;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::register_manager(CPUPolicyManager* manager)
|
|
{
|
|
assert(manager != NULL);
|
|
|
|
ManagerIterator end = _registered.end();
|
|
|
|
if (find(_registered.begin(), end, manager) == end)
|
|
_registered.push_back(manager);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::unregister_manager(CPUPolicyManager* manager)
|
|
{
|
|
assert(manager != NULL);
|
|
|
|
ManagerIterator end = _registered.end();
|
|
ManagerIterator pos = find(_registered.begin(), end, manager);
|
|
|
|
if (pos != end)
|
|
{
|
|
deactivate_policies(*pos);
|
|
_registered.erase(pos);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
CPUPolicy*
|
|
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::get_current_policy(History* history) throw(runtime_error)
|
|
{
|
|
assert(history != NULL);
|
|
|
|
ActiveIterator policy = _active_policies.find(history);
|
|
|
|
if (policy == _active_policies.end())
|
|
throw runtime_error("No active policy associated with this "
|
|
"history is available.");
|
|
|
|
return policy->second;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::activate_policy(History *history, CPUPolicy* policy)
|
|
{
|
|
assert(history != NULL);
|
|
|
|
ActiveIterator end = _active_policies.end();
|
|
ActiveIterator pos = _active_policies.find(history);
|
|
|
|
if (pos != end && pos->second != policy)
|
|
_active_policies[history]->deactivate();
|
|
|
|
if(policy == NULL)
|
|
{
|
|
_active_policies.erase(pos);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (pos == end || pos->second != policy)
|
|
{
|
|
try
|
|
{
|
|
// policy->activate() needs already an active policy, because:
|
|
// * it calls the configure() method on the
|
|
// insert-your-favourite-scripting-language-here-policy
|
|
// * which in turn calls the configure() method in the
|
|
// code written by the user
|
|
// * which probably uses Simulation to get the _active_ C++ policy,
|
|
// so it can get its policy_parameters()
|
|
// ... so **DON'T** play Mr. Clever Dick and swap the following two
|
|
// lines in an optimization frenzy! Or the user policy WILL fail.
|
|
_active_policies[history] = policy;
|
|
policy->activate();
|
|
}
|
|
catch(const CPUPolicyException& e)
|
|
{
|
|
// See the comment above to understand why we do this
|
|
// in this way
|
|
_active_policies.erase(_active_policies.find(history));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::CPUPoliciesGatekeeper()
|
|
{}
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::deactivate_policies(CPUPolicyManager* manager)
|
|
{
|
|
typedef vector<CPUPolicy*>::iterator CPUPolicyIterator;
|
|
|
|
vector<CPUPolicy*> avail_policies = manager->get_avail_policies();
|
|
|
|
CPUPolicyIterator avail_it = avail_policies.begin();
|
|
CPUPolicyIterator avail_end = avail_policies.end();
|
|
|
|
for (; avail_it != avail_end; ++avail_it)
|
|
{
|
|
// TODO isn't there a way to write more compact code by using
|
|
// library utilities?
|
|
ActiveIterator act_it = _active_policies.begin();
|
|
|
|
while (act_it != _active_policies.end())
|
|
{
|
|
if (act_it->second == *avail_it)
|
|
{
|
|
ActiveIterator removable = act_it++;
|
|
removable->second->deactivate();
|
|
_active_policies.erase(removable);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
act_it++;
|
|
}
|
|
} //~ for(avail_it)
|
|
}
|
|
|