matteo/sgpemv2
matteo/sgpemv2
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

- Incapsulate code so that the hack we previously used in CPUPoliciesGatekeeper isn't needed anymore

Browse source 
- Now CPUPolicy has a callback method for scripting languages, but it is up to derived classes to take
mutexes and set the value when needed (maybe we can improve this?)


git-svn-id: svn://svn.gna.org/svn/sgpemv2/trunk@862 3ecf2c5c-341e-0410-92b4-d18e462d057c
This commit is contained in:
tchernobog 2006-08-14 14:28:41 +00:00
parent 390af1f09d
commit 45ef305a1b
7 changed files with 80 additions and 39 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18
src/backend/cpu_policies_gatekeeper.cc
View file

@ -118,25 +118,11 @@ CPUPoliciesGatekeeper::activate_policy(History *history, CPUPolicy* policy) thro
try
{
// policy->activate() needs already an active policy, because:
// * it calls the configure() method on the
// insert-your-favourite-scripting-language-here-policy
// * which in turn calls the configure() method in the
// code written by the user
// * which probably uses Simulation to get the _active_ C++ policy,
// so it can get its policy_parameters()
// ... so **DON'T** play Mr. Clever Dick and swap the following two
// lines in an optimization frenzy! Or the user policy WILL fail.
_active_policies[history] = policy;
policy->activate();
_active_policies[history] = policy;
}
catch(const CPUPolicyException& e)
{
//std::cerr << e.what() << std::endl;
// See the comment above to understand why we do this
// in this way
_active_policies.erase(_active_policies.find(history));
{
// the caller need to know if it failed
throw;
}